What is the first step in a common SWLCAT problem-solving approach to conflicting deadlines with safety duties?

• A. Define the problem
• B. List tasks
• C. Assess safety impact
• D. Consult supervisor

Answer: (A)

In this SWLCAT approach, the starting move is to clearly define the problem. That means precisely stating what deadline is in conflict with which safety duty, what safety obligations must still be met, and what constraints or risks are involved. By outlining the exact scope—what needs to be done, by when, and what could go wrong if safety tasks are rushed or skipped—you create a concrete target for the rest of the problem‑solving steps. This clarity helps you determine what success looks like and what trade-offs are permissible, so you can plan effectively without compromising safety.

Defining the problem first also sets up the subsequent steps to be meaningful. Once you know the exact conflict, you can list the necessary tasks with proper priority, assess how each task impacts safety, and decide on the best course of action—whether it’s reordering work, adjusting timelines, or seeking guidance. Consulting a supervisor or making risk-based judgments should come after you’ve articulated the problem and understood the safety implications, so any input or decisions are anchored in a precise, shared understanding of what needs to be resolved.